It is three in the afternoon. Name what each of your people is working on at this moment.
Most owners can name what everybody is responsible for. Very few can name what is actually in front of them right now, and the difference between those two things is where most planning goes wrong.
This is not about watching people
That is the usual objection and it is worth dealing with directly. The aim is not to check whether somebody is working. If you do not trust your people to work, a screen will not fix that.
The aim is to know where work is sitting, which is a different thing entirely.
When a customer calls about an urgent job, you want to know what has to move aside for it, and who is already carrying more than they should be. Without that you give the urgent job to whoever is nearest, which is usually the person already most loaded, because that is the person who answers quickly.
What a business looks like without it
Work gets handed out by availability rather than capacity. The reliable person quietly ends up with three times the load and nobody can see it until they break or leave.
Two people do the same thing because neither knew the other had picked it up.
And when something is late, the first half hour goes in finding out where it actually is, which is time spent on the problem rather than on the fix.
The useful version
Not timesheets. Just the live list: what is open, who has it, what state it is in, and what is waiting on somebody else.
Most teams do not resist this. They resist being measured on it. The list itself is usually a relief, because it finally shows how much the busy person is carrying.
Right now, without asking: who on your team is carrying the most, and are you sure?
Making the live picture of who is carrying what visible, without turning it into surveillance, is a line we are careful about. Ask us how we would set it up for your team.
Comments
Nothing here yet. Be the first to say something.