An enquiry came in on Tuesday afternoon. Somebody looked at it, thought he would reply properly after finishing the dispatch, and did not.
Wednesday was worse. Thursday, somebody half remembered it and could not find it. On Friday the customer bought from somebody else, not because they were better, but because they replied.
No decision was ever taken to lose that order. It was lost by a series of reasonable small delays.
Why this is almost never seen
A lost sale leaves no record. You know exactly how many orders you took last month. Nobody can tell you how many enquiries came in, how many were answered, and how many were quietly dropped, because the enquiries live in a phone, an inbox, a diary and somebody's head.
So the failure is invisible, which means nobody is ever held to it, which means it keeps happening. If you measure nothing else this month, measure this.
Fast beats good, more often than owners expect
A buyer who is enquiring is usually enquiring in three places. The first serious reply takes the conversation. Not the best quotation, the first one that sounds like a human who understood the question.
Replying in an hour with incomplete information nearly always beats replying in two days with a perfect file. You can refine a quote. You cannot refine silence.
What actually fixes it
Every enquiry lands in one place. Every enquiry has one name against it. Every enquiry has a next date, and somebody sees the list of what is due today without having to go looking for it.
That is all. No strategy, no training programme. The leak is not skill. The leak is that nothing in the business is holding the list.
Count last month honestly: how many enquiries came in, and how many got a reply the same day?
Building the list that stops enquiries leaking is one of the first things we set up for a business. Ask us what yours would have caught last month.
Comments
Nothing here yet. Be the first to say something.